Devin vs Kiro
A side-by-side comparison of capabilities, autonomy, integrations, and pricing to help you choose.
Short answer: choose Devin if you want autonomous ai software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed pr (Supervised agent, usage); choose Kiro if you want aws's spec-driven agentic ide for structured software engineering (Supervised agent, freemium).
| Devin | Kiro | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Autonomous AI software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed PR | AWS's spec-driven agentic IDE for structured software engineering |
| Type | agent | product-with-agents |
| Autonomy | Supervised agent | Supervised agent |
| Pricing | usage · $20/mo + usage (ACU credits) | freemium · $0 (Free, 50 credits); Pro $20/mo |
| Best for | enterprise, mid-market, developers | developers, mid-market, enterprise |
| Deployment | saas, api | saas, api |
| Modalities | text, code, browser, api | text, code |
| Models | claude, proprietary | claude, open-source, model-agnostic |
| Protocols | mcp, rest-api, function-calling | mcp, function-calling |
| Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira | Amazon Bedrock, AWS IAM Identity Center, MCP servers, Amazon Q Developer (migration) |
| Capabilities | 4 documented | 4 documented |
Devin
- +Genuinely async, delegated model: handles whole tickets and large parallel migrations rather than line-by-line autocomplete
- +Deep workflow integration (Slack, Jira, Linear, GitHub) plus DeepWiki codebase indexing and a public API
- +Validated at large, complex enterprises
- -Best on clear, verifiable tasks; Cognition's own framing acknowledges it can make mistakes or get stuck on complex work and needs human review
- -Usage-based ACU billing can get expensive and unpredictable on open-ended work
Kiro
- +Spec-first workflow makes AI output more reviewable, auditable, and team-ownable than free-form prompting
- +Model-flexible via Amazon Bedrock (Claude, DeepSeek, MiniMax, open-weight) with task-based routing
- +Backed by AWS with enterprise auth (SAML/SCIM SSO) and a migration path from Amazon Q Developer
- -Credit-based usage can get expensive and unpredictable at scale, and unused credits do not roll over
- -The requirements/design/tasks process adds overhead versus lightweight assistants for quick edits
Which should you choose?
Devin is autonomous ai software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed pr, best for enterprise, mid-market, developers. Kiro is aws's spec-driven agentic ide for structured software engineering, best for developers, mid-market, enterprise. The right choice depends on the autonomy level you want, your existing integrations, and your budget, all compared above.
This comparison is generated from the sourced Devin and Kiro profiles. Open either profile to review its evidence and last-reviewed date.