Claude Code vs Devin
A side-by-side comparison of capabilities, autonomy, integrations, and pricing to help you choose.
Short answer: choose Claude Code if you want anthropic's agentic coding agent that lives in your terminal (Supervised agent, subscription); choose Devin if you want autonomous ai software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed pr (Supervised agent, usage).
| Claude Code | Devin | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Anthropic's agentic coding agent that lives in your terminal | Autonomous AI software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed PR |
| Type | agent | agent |
| Autonomy | Supervised agent | Supervised agent |
| Pricing | subscription · Included in Claude Pro ($20/mo); also pay-as-you-go via API tokens | usage · $20/mo + usage (ACU credits) |
| Best for | developers, enterprise, mid-market | enterprise, mid-market, developers |
| Deployment | saas, api | saas, api |
| Modalities | text, code, api | text, code, browser, api |
| Models | claude | claude, proprietary |
| Protocols | mcp, rest-api, function-calling | mcp, rest-api, function-calling |
| Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, GitHub Actions, MCP servers | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira |
| Capabilities | 4 documented | 4 documented |
Claude Code
- +True terminal-native agent: reads, edits, runs, and commits across a whole codebase rather than autocompleting lines
- +Flexible autonomy, from per-action approval to auto mode to fully headless runs for CI
- +Deep ecosystem: MCP support, subagents, plugins, GitHub Actions, and IDE extensions, plus a public Agent SDK
- -API-token usage on heavy tasks can get expensive and hard to predict
- -Locked to Anthropic's own Claude models (no model choice)
Devin
- +Genuinely async, delegated model: handles whole tickets and large parallel migrations rather than line-by-line autocomplete
- +Deep workflow integration (Slack, Jira, Linear, GitHub) plus DeepWiki codebase indexing and a public API
- +Validated at large, complex enterprises
- -Best on clear, verifiable tasks; Cognition's own framing acknowledges it can make mistakes or get stuck on complex work and needs human review
- -Usage-based ACU billing can get expensive and unpredictable on open-ended work
Which should you choose?
Claude Code is anthropic's agentic coding agent that lives in your terminal, best for developers, enterprise, mid-market. Devin is autonomous ai software engineer that takes delegated tickets to a reviewed pr, best for enterprise, mid-market, developers. The right choice depends on the autonomy level you want, your existing integrations, and your budget, all compared above.
This comparison is generated from the sourced Claude Code and Devin profiles. Open either profile to review its evidence and last-reviewed date.